May 25, 2013

Can I Bring an Observer with me to my Social Security Disability Hearing?

You may feel scared or intimidated as the date of your Social Security disability hearing approaches. Would it be ok if you brought a friend or relative into the hearing room to give you moral support. In this video I explain hearing office policy regarding witnesses and observers.

Can I Bring an Observer with me to my Social Security Disability Hearing from Jonathan Ginsberg on Vimeo.

Why do Vocational Witnesses Appear to Testify at Social Security disability hearings?

Vocational Witness testimony in Social Security disability cases from Jonathan Ginsberg on Vimeo.

In this video, I talk about vocational witness testimony in a Social Security disability case.  Vocational witnesses appear and testify at many Social Security disability hearings.  At first, this may seem odd, as you have most likely never met this person and now he or she will be giving testimony about your hearing.

SSDI judges use vocational witnesses because the main issue they are deciding has to do with your capacity to work.  Basically, during the hearing, the judge will be trying to identify specific limitations that arise from your medical or mental health condition.  More specifically, the judge will be concerning himself with limitations that will impact your capacity to work.

For example, suppose that you hurt your back and you testify that you experience severe pain 3 to 4 hours per day and that the pain is so severe that you cannot sit or stand but have to lie down and take narcotic pain medication until you fall asleep.  If the medical record supports your testimony and the judge finds you credible, he might ask the VE a question like this:

[Read more...]

Big Changes Coming Soon to the Social Security Disability Decision Making Process?

Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn has released a comprehensive deficit reduction plan for the United States called Back in Black.  Included in this almost 600 page plan is a subsection related to Social Security disability called Social Security Disability Programs:  Improving the Quality of Benefit Award Decisions.   Senator Coburn notes that if current financial trends continue,  the SSDI and SSI programs will run out of money in 2015 or 2016.   While no one expects Congress to let this happen, the immediacy of the SSDI program's default has caught the attention of lawmakers in the House and Senate.

Senator Coburn argues that "significant stress on the [Social Security disability] trust fund is due in part to the fact that the number of individuals receiving disability benefits continues to rise at an unprecedented rate. "  He quotes a study from the Center for American Progress which reports that the disability program "provides strong incentives to applicants and beneficiaries to remain permanently out of the labor force, and it provides no incentives to employers to implement cost-effective accommodations that enale employees with work limitations to remain on the job.”  Further “too many work-capable individuals involuntarily exit the labor force and apply for and often receive” Social Security disability.

Over a two year period, Senator Coburn and his staff reviewed SSDI hearing decisions from Virginia, Alabama and Oklahoma.  His report concludes that a significant number of the hearing decisions were flawed because of poor hearing practices, improper evaluation of evidence by hearing judges, outdated job lists (referring to the Dictionary of Occupational Titles), and inconsistent use of consultative examinations.

The Coburn Committee’s recommendations include:

  • presence of government representatives at hearing to oppose claims
  • increasing hearing decision reviews
  • enhanced ALJ training
  • “reform” of the grid rules
  • revision of consultative evaluation processes

While Senator Coburn’s recommendations have not yet been formally adopted by the Social Security Administration, it seems likely that Congress and SSA officials will implement some of these changes to reduce the drain on the disability trust fund.

Has Social Security Instructed its Judges to Deny More Claims?

secret memo to social security judgesOver the past few months, lawyers in the Social Security disability legal community have been talking about a rumor that Social Security administrators in Washington have sent out a memo to judges working in hearing offices throughout the country instructing them to cut back on the number of approvals being issued in disability cases.   Historically, about 60% of cases taken to hearing have been approved – but according to this rumor, Social Security wants the approval rate to be around 30%.

There is no question that the Social Security disability trust fund is running out of money and judges in the local hearing offices are aware of this issue.

I have found no evidence that a memo has been sent, but I do note that all of the judges before whom I appear are requiring more and better evidence.  Specifically, I am looking for the following when I accept a case and from my discussions with colleagues throughout the country, they are doing likewise:

  • on-going treatment records – ideally records documenting several years’ worth of treatment
  • a definitive diagnosis – your doctor needs to be able to identify specifically the medical condition or conditions that impact your work capacity
  • support from your treating doctor in the form of a functional capacity form or narrative report – if your doctor does not want to get involved, or otherwise won’t cooperate, your case will be more difficult to win
  • efforts by my client to try to work – under Social Security’s definitions, an unsuccessful work attempt is one that lasts less than 3 months.  If you try to work but cannot, I think you enhance your credibility by showing that you are fighting against the idea of being disabled, not embracing it
  • older claimants – 45 or older

Work Attempts Before and After a Finding of Disability

Social Security has a stated goal of encouraging disabled claimants to return to work. However, as a practical matter, work attempts are treated very differently depending on where you are in the process. While you are waiting for your decision, work attempts can help your case (if these attempts are short and unsuccessful) or they can cause a judge to conclude that you are not disabled and do have the capacity for work.

After you are found disabled, my experience has been that Social Security is much more forgiving in terms of both the length of your work attempts and the type of work you may try.

How to Win Your Back Pain Case in a Social Security Disability Hearing

Social Security judges see more back pain cases than any other impairment. Because of this, you need to do whatever you can to make your case stand out. If you come to your hearing with vague complaints that your lower back “hurts all the time,” that you “can’t lift very much” and that you “can’t sit very long” you are going to lose. Judges expect to see MRI or CT scan reports, support from a treating doctor, on-going treatment records, and specific testimony from you about what you can and cannot do.

In this video I discuss how I approach back pain cases and some specific steps you can take to improve your chances at winning.

How to Win Your Disability Claim Early


One of the biggest complaints I hear from my clients has to do with the delays that plague the Social Security disability system. Why should a claimant have to wait 2 to 3 years to get a decision on his application?
When you file your claim, there are 5 different points in time where you can be approved:

  1. initial application
  2. reconsideration appeal
  3. administrative law judge hearing
  4. Appeals Council review
  5. District Court appeal

For most claimants, the Appeals Council and District Court appeal do not come into play.  Very few cases are taken to these levels of appeal and even fewer are approved.

Thus, for all practical purposes, most claimants should be concerned about getting approved at the “State Agency” level – initial application and reconsideration, or at the “Administrative Law Judge” level – the hearing.

In terms of the time frames involved, a decision on your initial application will be made within 4 to 6 months after you apply.  If you are denied, and file a reconsideration appeal, that decision will be made within another 4 to 6 months.   The initial and reconsideration phases of your case, therefore, will be complete within 8 months to 1 year after you apply.

If you are denied at reconsideration and you request a hearing, you are likely to see a 12 to 18 month wait.  As you can see, it takes twice a long to get a hearing as it does to get a decision from the State Agency. [Read more...]

Should I Be Concerned About the Judge’s Delay in Issuing my Hearing Decision


I frequently get emails from blog readers all over the country who appeared at a disability hearing several weeks or months previously and they are concerned that they are hearing nothing from the judge.  Sometimes these folks will call the hearing office and the receptionist will tell them that their decision is “in writing.”

Obviously, if you have been waiting 12, 18 or more months, it can be very frustrating to finally get your hearing, then find yourself waiting weeks or months for a decision with no way to get a status update.

Unfortunately, there is no much you can do about this state of affairs.  Social Security personnel – and especially the judges – are overworked and their offices are understaffed.  In most cases the judges rely on “writers” to actually produce the written decisions and if the writers are backlogged, the decisions will be backlogged as well.

Even your attorney probably won’t be able to do much.  When we call the ODAR offices, the front desk receptionist tells us the same thing he tells you – “the decision is in writing – we don’t know when it will be issued.”

In my office I will email the judge if the decision is not released after five months or so.  Sometimes that gets results and sometimes it does not.

What is a “Closed Period of Disability” and Should You ask for it?

Sometimes the evidence in a Social Security disability claim does not support a finding of on-going disability.  Sometimes the medical record documents improvement in your condition and sometimes there simply is not evidence – often because you may not have the money to afford treatment.  While some judges will give disability claimants the benefits of the doubt, other judges will not and you should have a “plan B” if your judge expresses concern about whether your medical record supports your claim.

Sometimes it can make sense to consider asking the judge for a “closed period of disability.”  In this video, I explain what closed period is and why it can sometimes be a good strategy. I also discuss a recent case I tried in which my client will be approved for a closed period.

A Disturbing Trend in Social Security Disability Hearings

Over the past few months, I have noticed a disturbing trend in many of the Social Security hearing offices where I appear.   Many of the case files do not contain comprehensive medical records or forms that translate medical problems into specific work limitations.  Why?  Many of the free and low cost medical and mental health clinics that used to service disability claimants have closed up shop.  It seems to me that some of the judges that hear disability cases are turning down deserving cases on the basis of a thin medical file when the reason for lack of treatment is financial, not a function of the claimant’s motivation.